ORLANDO GASIFICATION PLANT
Health & Environment
Sign up for this Superfund site’s mailing list
On this page:
What Are the Risks at the Site?
At each site, EPA determines the possibility for human and ecological contact (i.e., exposure) with contaminants at the site. EPA determines if the site poses a risk to humans, and if so, identifies actions that can be taken to control any possible exposure to humans until site cleanup has been completed. Once complete, cleanup provides long-term human health and environmental protection at the site. (Superfund risk assessment process)
- Site contamination does not currently threaten people living and working near the site. Both residents and businesses use the public water system for drinking water. Site investigations also indicate that site-related groundwater contamination is not spreading. Through ongoing site investigations and groundwater monitoring, EPA, FDEP and the site’s PRPs continue to protect people and the environment from site contamination.
- Site investigations identified contamination in soil and groundwater that could potentially harm people in the area. Soil and groundwater contamination resulted from coal tar waste product handling practices at the site. Contaminants of concern include volatile organic compounds (VOCs), PAHs and heavy metals such as arsenic.
EPA uses performance measures to track environmental results at Superfund sites. If you have any questions or concerns about the measures at this site, please contact the site team members listed under Site Contacts.
Read more about Superfund Remedial Performance Measures.
|Status at this
|What does this mean?|
|Human Exposure Under Control||Yes||Yes means assessments indicate that across the entire site:
No means an unsafe level of contamination has been detected at the site and a reasonable expectation exists that people could be exposed.Insufficient data means that, due to uncertainty regarding exposures, one cannot draw conclusions as to whether human exposures are controlled, typically because:
|Groundwater Migration Under Control||Insufficient Data||
Yes means EPA reviewed all information on known and reasonably expected groundwater contamination. EPA concluded the migration of contaminated groundwater is stabilized and there is no unacceptable discharge to surface water. EPA will conduct monitoring to confirm that affected groundwater remains in the original area of contamination.
No means EPA has reviewed all information on known and reasonably expected groundwater contamination, and the migration of contaminated groundwater is not stabilized.
Insufficient data means that due to uncertainty regarding contaminated groundwater migration, EPA cannot draw conclusions as to whether the migration of contaminated groundwater is stabilized.
Yes means the physical construction of the cleanup is complete for the entire site.
No means either physical construction is not complete or actions are still needed to address contamination.
|Sitewide Ready for Anticipated Use||No||Yes means:
No means that one or more of these three criteria have not been met. However, a site listed as no may still have redevelopment occurring on portions of the site and may be eligible for additional redevelopment.