ABERDEEN CONTAMINATED GROUND WATER
Health & Environment
On this page:
What Are the Risks at the Site?
Risks and pathways addressed by the cleanup include health risks from people ingesting or touching contaminants in groundwater. EPA has not pin point a source of the contamination. It is feasible that there were several sources of the contamination.
EPA assessed whether residents or workers might be at risk from harmful groundwater vapors in buildings. EPA found that vapor intrusion did not pose a threat to residents and workers.
In 2012 and 2015, the Town of Aberdeen took supply well #5 and supply well #9, respectively, out of service due to the persistent elevated concentrations of TCE being detected in the water supplied by the well.
EPA uses performance measures to track environmental results at Superfund sites. If you have any questions or concerns about the measures at this site, please contact the site team members listed under Site Contacts.
Read more about Superfund Remedial Performance Measures.
|Status at this
|What does this mean?|
|Human Exposure Under Control||Yes||Yes means assessments indicate that across the entire site:
No means an unsafe level of contamination has been detected at the site and a reasonable expectation exists that people could be exposed.Insufficient data means that, due to uncertainty regarding exposures, one cannot draw conclusions as to whether human exposures are controlled, typically because:
|Groundwater Migration Under Control||No||
Yes means EPA reviewed all information on known and reasonably expected groundwater contamination. EPA concluded the migration of contaminated groundwater is stabilized and there is no unacceptable discharge to surface water. EPA will conduct monitoring to confirm that affected groundwater remains in the original area of contamination.
No means EPA has reviewed all information on known and reasonably expected groundwater contamination, and the migration of contaminated groundwater is not stabilized.
Insufficient data means that due to uncertainty regarding contaminated groundwater migration, EPA cannot draw conclusions as to whether the migration of contaminated groundwater is stabilized.
Yes means the physical construction of the cleanup is complete for the entire site.
No means either physical construction is not complete or actions are still needed to address contamination.
|Sitewide Ready for Anticipated Use||No||Yes means:
No means that one or more of these three criteria have not been met. However, a site listed as no may still have redevelopment occurring on portions of the site and may be eligible for additional redevelopment.