Superfund Information Systems: Site Profile

Superfund Site:


Cleanup Activities

On this page:

On related pages:


The New London Submarine Base site covers 576 acres on the eastern bank of the Thames River in Groton and Ledyard, Connecticut. Wastes generated at the base contaminated soil, sediment, and groundwater. Long-term cleanup and monitoring are ongoing.

The base was established in 1868. It has served as an operation and support base for submarine activities in the Atlantic Ocean since 1916. The site contains many contaminated areas, including three landfills, chemical storage sites, tank farms, contaminated watercourses, and varying degrees of groundwater contamination. The U.S. Navy is the lead agency for site investigation and cleanup, with oversight provided by EPA and the Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection.

From 1957 to 1973, VOCs, pesticides, PCBs, spent battery acids and other wastes were buried below the water table in an 11-acre landfill situated near wetlands. A disposal area known as the Over Bank Disposal Area was created after an earthen dam was built in 1957. This Defense Reutilization and Marketing Office was used as a burning ground and landfill from 1950 to 1969 and is now used for temporary storage. Inspection reports from 1982 recorded leaking containers and evidence of spills associated with containers stored on the ground. In 1983, about 40 gallons of PCB-contaminated oil were reported to have been spilled onto the ground. In 1988, Navy sampling revealed lead, cadmium and pesticides in sediments and surface water.

Top of Page

What Has Been Done to Clean Up the Site?

The site is being addressed through federal actions.

There has been substantial environmental progress at the site. All three of the landfills have been capped. Eight removal actions have been completed. Contaminated soil and sediment at the area known as the Over Bank Disposal Area has been removed. Wetland restoration and soil excavation at the weapons center has finished. Site areas are listed below. The Navy investigated almost all of these areas in 1990.

Area A Landfill: This landfill had accepted all non-salvageable materials. Leachate from the landfill drains into wetland and is ultimately carried downstream and discharged into the Thames River. In late 1995, a cleanup plan was developed that included installing a double-lined landfill cap and monitoring the site. This work was done in 1997. Before this, however, a cleanup was done at a drum storage area on top of the landfill.

Over Bank Disposal Area: The Navy removed all contaminated soils and debris as an interim cleanup measure in March 1997. The 1998 cleanup plan required excavating and dredging contaminated soil and sediment, and wetlands restoration. A follow-on cleanup addressed related compounds discovered at the new source area. The remedy was updated in 2007 to include institutional controls and five-year reviews because some waste was left in place.

Defense Realization and Marketing Office: The Navy removed soil contaminated with PCBs and lead, filled the area with clean fill, and placed asphalt over the area. Monitoring will determine if the cleanup was successful. The 1998 and 2006 remedies required restrictions to prevent digging, disturbing the cap and other areas as well as groundwater monitoring to make sure contaminants do not migrate to the Thames River. These remedies were in place by 2008.

Lower Sub Base: In 1994, the Navy removed lead-contaminated soil from the Building 31 area, disposed it off site, and filled the area with clean fill. In January 2010, the Navy dredged contaminated sediments near Pier 1 in the former marine railway. A final remedy was selected for the site in 2012 for soil, sediment, and groundwater.  The remedy is currently being constructed.

Goss Cove Landfill: Landfill capping finished in October 2001. Groundwater monitoring is ongoing.

Area A Weapons Center: Excavation of contaminated soil and sediment finished in late 2001.

Torpedo Shops: A 2004 decision by EPA requires excavation with off-site disposal. About 1,600 cubic yards of contaminated soil was excavated and disposed off site.

Basewide Groundwater: For some parts of the site, use restrictions were put in place to ban extraction and use of the groundwater.

Area A Wetland: Excavation of contaminated sediments and restoration of native wetland vegetation finished in 2013.

Top of Page

What Is the Current Site Status?

There has been substantial environmental progress at the Naval Submarine Base. All three of the landfills have been capped, eight removal actions have been completed and contaminated soil and sediment at the area known as the Over Bank Disposal Area has been removed. Wetland restoration is finished at this area. And soil excavation was finished at the weapons center in December 2001.

Of the 40 sites originally identified, 38 have been cleaned up or closed out. Although only one site requires further action, all potential health risks have been controlled. In addition, while many of the contaminants detected across the site were within acceptable risk standards for industrial use, risks associated with future residential use scenarios were identified and are the focus of EPA’s former and future cleanup decisions.

Top of Page

Activity and Use Limitations

At this site, activity and use limitations that EPA calls institutional controls are in place. Institutional controls play an important role in site remedies because they reduce exposure to contamination by limiting land or resource use. They also guide human behavior. For instance, zoning restrictions prevent land uses – such as residential uses – that are not consistent with the level of cleanup.

For more background, see Institutional Controls.

Institutional controls are required for this site.
This site requires ICs because a decision document, such as a Record of Decision, has documented some level of contamination and/or remedy component at the site that would restrict use of the site. These ICs are required to help ensure the site is used in an appropriate way and that activities at the site do not damage the cleanup components. These ICs will remain in place for as long as the contamination and/or cleanup components stay on site. The site contacts should be consulted if there are questions on the ICs for this site.
The following IC Instruments provide media-specific use restrictions that have been implemented by EPA for protecting human health, the environment and remedial engineering on this site. Instruments are documents used by EPA or other organizations to implement the use restrictions at a site. To know about other media-specific use restrictions that are planned but not implemented at this site, please contact the Regional Office using the Site Contact listed above.
Click here for IC Instruments implemented for this site.

To contact EPA regarding Institutional Controls and/or activity and use limitations, please complete this form.

ICs are generally defined as administrative and legal tools that do not involve construction or physically changing the site. Common examples of ICs include site use and excavation restrictions put in place through State and local authorities like zoning, permits and easements. ICs are normally used when waste is left onsite and when there is a limit to the activities that can safely take place at the site (i.e., the site cannot support unlimited use and unrestricted exposure) and/or when cleanup components of the remedy remains onsite (e.g., landfill caps, pumping equipment or pipelines). Effective ICs help ensure that these sites can be returned to safe and beneficial use.
Disclaimer: This information is being provided by EPA as an informational tool to further assist the public in determining the types of restrictions that may be in place at National Priorities List sites being addressed by EPA under the Superfund program. In addition to the areas addressed by the institutional controls identified on this web site there may be other areas on the property that require restrictions on use of the property that are not captured in this EPA database. States and other entities may have implemented laws or restrictions applicable to this site. The information provided herein does not replace a title search or meet "All Appropriate Inquiry" requirements. U.S. EPA encourages users to review the Site files to obtain information regarding remedy components, containment systems and the land use for which cleanup standards were selected for these sites. More information and links can be found in the Institutional Control instrument collection of document, above, and the EPA regional offices may also be contacted.

Top of Page