OTIS AIR NATIONAL GUARD BASE/CAMP EDWARDS
On this page:
- What Has Been Done to Clean Up the Site?
- What Is the Current Site Status?
- Activity and Use Limitations
- Green Remediation
On related pages:
Protecting Cape Cod's drinking water continues to be a major focus at EPA New England. The Joint Base Cape Cod (JBCC) (formerly known as the Massachusetts Military Reservation (MMR)), a 22,000-acre property that has been used for military training activities since 1911, is located over a sole source aquifer that provides drinking water for 200,000 year-round and 500,000 seasonal residents of Cape Cod. Parts of the aquifer have been contaminated by fuel spills, training, disposal, and other past activities at JBCC’s Camp Edwards and Otis Air National Guard Base.
Two environmental cleanup programs at the JBCC are addressing areas of groundwater contamination, known as plumes, and their sources. One program managed by the Air Force is addressing contamination found primarily on Otis Air National Guard Base which is on the southern portion of the JBCC under the authority of Superfund. The other, managed by the Army, is addressing contamination from the northern portion of the base, Camp Edwards/Impact Area, under the authority of the Safe Drinking Water Act. Both of these program's efforts are being conducted with oversight from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection.
Otis Air National Guard Base
(Otis ANGB) became a Superfund site in 1989 when it was placed on National Priorities List (NPL). The site overlies the Sagamore Lens which was designated by the EPA as a sole source aquifer under the Safe Drinking Water Act. A Federal Facility Agreement (FFA) was signed in 1991 (and subsequently amended in Feb 2000) governing the Superfund cleanup. Contaminated areas were the result of chemical/fuel spills, fire training activities, landfills, and drainage structures. Since 1984 when contaminants were first detected in monitoring wells, numerous investigations and cleanups have been undertaken and completed. Currently, there are nine groundwater plumes undergoing extraction and treatment with a combined system rate of 8.5 million gallons per day. The Air Force’s land use control program ensures that groundwater remedies are protective until cleanup levels are met.
Camp Edwards/Impact Area
Concerned that military training was causing even more damage to the groundwater, EPA's New England Office in February 1997 (AO1 (PDF)) ordered the National Guard to conduct a study of the effects of military training on groundwater. In May 1997 (AO2 (PDF)), EPA suspended most military training at Camp Edwards, including all use of live explosives, propellants, flares and lead bullets. It was the first time in our country's history that military training activities had been halted due to environmental and public health concerns. The groundwater study, which is ongoing, has produced evidence of serious groundwater and soil contamination from training with munitions, from unexploded ordnance and from disposal of munitions and other hazardous materials. Currently, there are seven groundwater plumes undergoing extraction and treatment with a combined system rate of 4.1 million gallons per day.
As a result of the evidence of contamination, EPA in January 2000 (AO3 (PDF)) ordered the National Guard to begin the process for the removal of unexploded ordnance from the base and to clean up contaminated groundwater and soils. The order was the first of its kind in the country. And in January 2001 (AO4 (PDF)), EPA ordered the military to use a detonation chamber at the base to destroy the more than 2,500 rounds of different kinds of ammunition dug out of burial pits on the base during the course of the military's investigation of pollution at the firing ranges.
All four of EPA's orders were issued under the agency's emergency powers to prevent imminent and substantial endangerment to public health. (The first three orders were issued under the Safe Drinking Water Act, the fourth under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act.)
Please see the Information Repositories maintained by the US Air Force and US Army for additional information.
What Has Been Done to Clean Up the Site?
Otis Air National Guard Base
The site is being addressed through federal actions. Many projects addressing soil and groundwater contamination at the site have been implemented since the mid to late 1990s. Cleanups at about 25 separate source areas were completed in 2000-2002. About 100,000 tons of soil have been treated at the site. Installation of water supply lines to residents affected by and/or potentially affected by groundwater contamination has reduced the health threats posed by site contamination. A semi-annual residential well monitoring program is also in place. In addition, municipal water supply wells have been provided with treatment systems; approximately 8.5 million gallons per day of contaminated groundwater is currently being treated both on and off site. Surface water in Ashumet Pond, Johns Pond, and Snake Pond are tested annually to make sure the pond is safe for the public. EPA, in coordination with the Army, Air Force and the National Guard Bureau, has determined that the site does not pose an immediate threat to the environment or public health. Ongoing treatment systems will be operated and maintained until cleanup levels are met.
Camp Edwards/Impact Area
The Impact Area Groundwater Study Program (IAGWSP) Office began investigating the Impact Area in 1996. To date, 15,000 acres have been investigated. Fourteen operable units have been identified with installation of 1,200 monitoring wells in over 600 locations, and collection of over 100,000 groundwater and soil samples. Over 120,000 tons of soil has been excavated and treated. Approximately 300 acres have been partially cleared of unexploded ordnance with 600 tons of munitions-related scrap recycled. 18,500 tons of range soil has been removed and disposed. Sixteen treatment systems have been constructed for seven groundwater plumes which are primarily contaminated with RDX and perchlorate. Currently, 4.1 million gallons of groundwater are treated per day. The IAGWSP Office manages the implementation of land use controls to prevent exposures to contaminated groundwater and/or soil hazards.
For IAGWSP’s Administrative Record, visit http://jbcc-iagwsp.org/data/ for information on requesting documents via CLAMS (inter-library sharing network on Cape Cod).
What Is the Current Site Status?
Otis Air National Guard Base
Otis ANGB was placed on the Superfund program’s National Priorities List (NPL) in 1989; a Federal Facility Agreement (FFA) was signed in 1991 (and subsequently amended in March 2000) governing the Superfund cleanup. Signatories to the FFA include the National Guard Bureau, the Air Force and EPA (the Commonwealth of Massachusetts did not sign the original FFA, and U.S. Coast Guard was recently removed as a signatory).
Twelve groundwater treatment systems are currently in operation on nine groundwater plumes; the combined treatment system rate is approximately 8.5 million gallons per day. As part of ensuring that groundwater remedies are protective, the Air Force has been verifying that any private well above groundwater plumes, if present, does not pose a human health risk. All treated groundwater is returned to the aquifer or discharged to surface water.
Ongoing treatment systems will be operated and maintained until cleanup levels are met.
In 2014, based on recommendations from the Five Year Review Report, the Air Force began investigations for the emerging contaminants PFOA and PFOS, which are per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), and 1,4-Dioxane. PFAS were ingredients in aqueous film forming foams such as fire fighting foam. 1,4-Dioxane was a stabilizer in fuel.
PFAS was found in two existing groundwater plumes, Ashumet Valley and Landfill-1. In addition, a flightline investigation, which looked at on-base storage and historical fuel spills where fire fighting foam was applied, found a small, off-base plume originating from a spill at a rotary on Route 28 near the base's Falmouth gate. The Air Force has taken actions at this site and at Ashumet Valley to eliminate exposures to PFAS (and 1,4-Dioxane at Ashumet Valley) and has provided bottled water where private well samples were found to have concentrations which exceed the PFAS Final Lifetime Health Advisory in Falmouth and Mashpee. In-home treatment systems and connections to public water supplies have also been provided by the Air Force. Supplemental remedial investigations at Ashumet Valley are ongoing. Periodic private well sampling for PFAS continues to monitor for potential exposures in Falmouth and Mashpee.
1,4-Dioxane above the Massachusetts Method 1 GW-1 standard of 0.3 parts per billion was found in four existing groundwater plumes: Ashumet Valley, Chemical Spill-10, Chemical Spill-20, and Landfill-1. Supplemental remedial investigations for these groundwater plumes are ongoing. Periodic private well sampling for 1,4-Dioxane continues to monitor for potential exposures in Mashpee.
Camp Edwards/Impact Area
Working under the authority of Safe Drinking Water Act Administrative Orders and separate from the Superfund work, the Army as the Impact Area Groundwater Study Program is managing long-term groundwater and any remaining source area cleanups. Currently, there are seven groundwater plumes undergoing extraction and treatment with a combined system rate of 4.1 million gallons per day. The Army also manages a land use control program so that there are no public exposures to contaminated groundwater undergoing treatment. Long-term groundwater monitoring and operation and maintenance of treatment systems will continue until groundwater cleanup levels are met.
Activity and Use Limitations
At this site, activity and use limitations that EPA calls institutional controls are in place. Institutional controls play an important role in site remedies because they reduce exposure to contamination by limiting land or resource use. They also guide human behavior. For instance, zoning restrictions prevent land uses – such as residential uses – that are not consistent with the level of cleanup.
For more background, see Institutional Controls.
Institutional controls are required for this site.
This site requires ICs because a decision document, such as a Record of Decision, has documented some level of contamination and/or remedy component at the site that would restrict use of the site. These ICs are required to help ensure the site is used in an appropriate way and that activities at the site do not damage the cleanup components. These ICs will remain in place for as long as the contamination and/or cleanup components stay on site. The site contacts should be consulted if there are questions on the ICs for this site.
The following IC Instruments provide media-specific use restrictions that have been implemented by EPA for protecting human health, the environment and remedial engineering on this site. Instruments are documents used by EPA or other organizations to implement the use restrictions at a site. To know about other media-specific use restrictions that are planned but not implemented at this site, please contact the Regional Office using the Site Contact listed above.
Click here for IC Instruments implemented for this site.
To contact EPA regarding Institutional Controls and/or activity and use limitations, please complete this form.
ICs are generally defined as administrative and legal tools that do not involve construction or physically changing the site. Common examples of ICs include site use and excavation restrictions put in place through State and local authorities like zoning, permits and easements. ICs are normally used when waste is left onsite and when there is a limit to the activities that can safely take place at the site (i.e., the site cannot support unlimited use and unrestricted exposure) and/or when cleanup components of the remedy remains onsite (e.g., landfill caps, pumping equipment or pipelines). Effective ICs help ensure that these sites can be returned to safe and beneficial use.
Disclaimer: This information is being provided by EPA as an informational tool to further assist the public in determining the types of restrictions that may be in place at National Priorities List sites being addressed by EPA under the Superfund program. In addition to the areas addressed by the institutional controls identified on this web site there may be other areas on the property that require restrictions on use of the property that are not captured in this EPA database. States and other entities may have implemented laws or restrictions applicable to this site. The information provided herein does not replace a title search or meet "All Appropriate Inquiry" requirements. U.S. EPA encourages users to review the Site files to obtain information regarding remedy components, containment systems and the land use for which cleanup standards were selected for these sites. More information and links can be found in the Institutional Control instrument collection of document, above, and the EPA regional offices may also be contacted.
The Air Force installed a total of three 1.5 megawatt wind turbines – one in 2009 and two more in 2011 – to offset electrical costs for powering numerous ground water cleanup systems at the MMR.
Learn how the Otis ANGB/JBCC site became the first large-scale Department of Defense cleanup program to be completely offset by renewable energy in this video featuring Rose Forbes, Air Force Remediation Program Manager at Joint Base Cape Cod.