CRYSTAL CHEMICAL CO.
On this page:
- What Has Been Done to Clean Up the Site?
- What Is the Current Site Status?
- Sampling and Monitoring
- Emergency Response and Removal
On related pages:
Between 1968 and 1979, Crystal Chemical leased the site property from the owner, Southern Pacific Transportation Company (Southern Pacific), now Union Pacific Railroad Company (UPRR). In 1979, Crystal Chemical purchased the property and began manufacturing arsenic-containing herbicides on site. Operation and maintenance problems at the Crystal Chemical facility during the late 1970s resulted in several violations of state environmental standards. As a result of facility operations, soil and ground water on the site and adjacent properties were impacted by arsenic. In 1981, Crystal Chemical ceased operations, filed for bankruptcy and abandoned the site. The area surrounding the site is primarily used for commercial, light industrial and residential purposes. The property leased by Crystal Chemical was added to the National Priority List (NPL) in 1983. On September 27, 1990, USEPA issued a Record of Decision (ROD) that required remediation of affected soils and ground water. Following cleanup, operation and maintenance activities are ongoing. The site is being addressed through potentially responsible party (PRP) actions.
On June 16, 1992, the soil remedy ROD was amended to include excavating and consolidating soils that had arsenic concentrations greater than 30 parts per million (PPM), and covering the affected soils with an engineered barrier (cap) to control downward migration of rainfall and run-off through the affected soils. The entire system (affected soils and cap) is referred to as the monofill cap; which was completed in September 1995. Currently, activities related to the soil remedy include routine inspections and maintenance of the monofill cap.
On March 19, 1997, the ground water ROD remedy was amended to allow removal and/or containment of contaminated ground water. This was accomplished by pumping ground water from a recovery well located south of the monofill cap. A ground water containment system was installed in the remaining affected zones. The system was completed in 2003 and consists of a slurry wall, a natural subsurface levee, and a pressure relief system. Based on the effective results of a phytohydraulic pilot test in 2008, the PRS was shut down in 2009. The Site’s Groundwater Monitoring Plan (GWMP) was revised in December 2003. The current objectives of the GWMP are to monitor the groundwater within the slurry wall containment for the continued documentation of the slurry walls effectiveness, and to monitor the contaminated groundwater plume outside of the wall to document no-migration. In 2017, new monitoring wells were installed; EPA is currently holding other discussions with the PRP to further define the stability of the groundwater plume. Currently, activities related to the ground water remedy include routine inspections and maintenance of the containment system and continued monitoring activities. Groundwater monitoring and cap inspections are ongoing. A review of the data collected in 2017 indicates that the Site is in compliance with the groundwater Remedial Action Objectives.
What Has Been Done to Clean Up the Site?
The site is being addressed through potentially responsible party (PRP) actions.
EPA has conducted several five-year reviews of the site’s remedy; the most recent being the Fourth Five Year Review completed on September 25, 2015. These reviews ensure that the remedies put in place protect public health and the environment, and function as intended by site decision documents.
EPA determined that the remedy for groundwater is protective in the short term. Groundwater in the area is not being used for drinking water purposes. The City of Houston provides drinking water for the area. The remedy for affected soils at the Site is protective of human health and the environment and will remain so provided action items identified in the document are addressed (1. file a deed notice for cap protection in perpetuity; 2 perform routine monofill cap inspections). The soil arsenic levels exceeding human health protective levels are contained in the on-site monofill. The majority of contaminated groundwater is contained within a slurry wall; a smaller portion is outside of the wall. The groundwater extraction and treatment system for groundwater outside of the wall has been temporarily shut down during a pilot study of a potential new or additional groundwater remedy. Study results are being analyzed to determine if phytoremediation of contaminated groundwater may be an appropriate remedy to address remaining groundwater contamination, either by itself or in conjunction with groundwater extraction and treatment. The Site remedy is being addressed by the PRP. With EPA approval, the PRP has installed additional monitoring wells to monitor affected groundwater outside of the slurry wall containment; wherein, EPA is currently holding discussions with the PRP to further define the stability of the groundwater plume.
What Is the Current Site Status?
The site’s long-term remedy included excavation, on-site consolidation and capping of off-site arsenic-contaminated soil; groundwater extraction and treatment; and groundwater containment through use of a slurry wall/pressure release system. Remedy construction took place between 1995 and 2003.
In 2017, new monitoring wells were installed; EPA is currently holding other discussions with the PRP to further define the stability of the groundwater plume. Currently, activities related to the ground water remedy include routine inspections and maintenance of the containment system and continued monitoring activities. Groundwater monitoring and monofill cap inspections are ongoing. Data review indicates that the Site is in compliance with the groundwater Remedial Action Objectives. Current status is the annual inspection of the completed monofill, which contains the affected soils, and annual groundwater sampling to define the stabiliity of the groundwater plume.
Sampling and Monitoring
The monofill is inspected each year to document the continued effectiveness of the monofill to contain the affected soils. Annual groundwater elevation studies are conducted to document that the containment of the affected groundwater within the slurry wall is effective. Annual groundwater sampling of the contaminant groundwater plume outside of the slurry wall is conducted to evaluate the plume’s stable (i.e., no migration).
Emergency Response and Removal
Cleanup has also included removal actions, or short-term cleanups, to address immediate threats to human health and the environment. Removal actions included disposal of contaminated pond water; lime treatment of pond surface soil; installation of a temporary cap; and demolition, decontamination, and sale of on-site buildings and process equipment.